Philosophers of the ancient world believed that different musical "modes" influenced Human Beings in different ways.
They clearly knew what modern scientists believe they have discovered (when really they have merely rediscovered) that all matter vibrates at a certain frequency and is affected by harmonious or discordant frequencies.
It seems that ancient musical instruments were constructed so that the note A was tuned to 432 hertz. However, around the time of the second world war, this was changed and a musical standard of A being tuned to 440 hertz was adopted.
"Human progress depends on an absolute increase in wealth, not
redistribution or dissipation of the same."
I immediately saw that the political environment we suffer under today does nothing to increase absolute wealth with Nations, it merely seeks to redistribute what already exists. This is why, as I alluded to in yesterday's post, Humanity is not progressing but is moving backwards intellectually, scientifically and spiritually towards a new dark age.
Secondly, I realised that the builders of the British Empire had built their wealth by looting that of others, causing poverty and societal destruction in their wake (e.g. India).
It was freedom from the looting of the British Crown that the American revolutionaries sought to achieve.
Does it strike you that, despite the promises made to us when we were children, modern life is getting harder and less pleasurable?
We were promised that technology would free us from mundane jobs.
We were promised the "paperless office".
"They" told us that we would have more leisure time and work less, as technology would automate much of the drudgery associated with living.
Has any of this come to pass?
No.
In fact, it seems to me, that the Human race is now going backwards towards some kind of "dark age".
In light of this,would you like to live in a place where:
your government is committed to the education and improvement of the population via scientific and technological progress?
politicians pursue policies encouraging individual productivity and wealth, instead of policies dedicated to confiscating what little people have left?
the philosophy of government is to view people as divinely created?
your government supports increased population as a way to boost national improvement and wealth?
improvement of living standards are encouraged for all and not just a privileged few?
society does not not assume that people will only work to survive but release people from the "need" to work meaning they are more creative and productive in their vocations?
every person contributes and every person is looked after?
the ultimate aim of government is to provide happiness for the people?
You might be excused for thinking that these ideas come from communist, Utopian thinkers.
In fact, these are the ideas of the Cameralists, ideas which originated during the renaissance.
Authors Nancy Spannaus and Christopher White assert that Cameralist thinking inspired the American Declaration of Independence and the American Constitution.
Lyndon LaRouche seems to be a controversial figure. From what I can gather, some deem him an "anti-semite" and a Nazi. There is even a "LaRouche Watch" website, run by a gentleman named Dennis King, who clearly feels the LaRouche movement to be a cult.
However, the problem I envisage for those that criticise LaRouche is that he talks sense.
The documentary, "Firewall" (watch below) seeks to explain the origin of the current Economic Crisis, a crisis he sees as systemic in the financial system itself. The film seeks to show:
How the original American economic system sought to raise the living standards of the world population.
That Empire building nations such as Britain and the Netherlands sought to do the opposite; to loot the national resources and productive power of other countries.
How countries such as Germany sought to copy the American model and quickly achieved economic success.
The origin of WWI as a manipulation of Germany by Britain and France into a war that would destroy its economy.
How the Treaty of Versaille ruined Germany to the point where political extremists were needed to enforce order.
That Wall Street and London financiers supported the rise of Hitler and his totalitarian facist system, only for Hitler to turn against those that had put him in power.
How post-war policy in the Anglo-American world was to divorce money from the physical economy, relegating money to a "product" that could be used for speculation.
How assasination of troublesome politicians and endless war has been used to create a perpetual debt-based economy and a population trapped in fear.
How recent economic crises have been caused by a monetary system based on nothing but a blind confidence in it.
In the old days there was no paper money. The accepted token of
exchange was precious metal minted into coins by the Church and the
Crown. Because there was only a limited amount of gold and silver
available, the economic life of the nation had a certain regularity.
An even greater restriction existed throughout Christendom. This
was a prohibition against usury, or charging interest. The Church held
it to be a grave sin and the code was upheld by the civil powers. There
were harsh penalties for those who broke the law.
The regulation of usury was to prevent the separation of money
from reality. Money is not a good, it is a measure. It is fraud to
pretend otherwise, and constitutes theft. Usury is making money from
lending money; it is making money from nothing. This is exactly what is
happening today on a colossal scale.
Several important things arose from the prohibition of usury in
medieval Christendom. Firstly Jews, who had taken to wandering around
Europe in the Middle Ages, began to specialize in money-lending and
other practices which were forbidden to Christians. Exploited
Christians, both peasants and aristocracy, found themselves being bled
dry by usurers, which is why there were sporadic uprisings,
imprisonments and expulsions of Jews throughout Europe. It is one reason
why King Edward I expelled these perfidious people from England in
1290. Oliver Cromwell allowed them back when the moral authority of the
Church was undermined and the King was beheaded in 1649.
Secondly, gold coins, jewels and other valuables were deposited
with people who held strongboxes. This was usually with goldsmiths and
money-lenders who, more often than not, were one and the same. These
loan-sharks and scriveners realized that, without much chance of being
found out, they could charge people for looking after their deposits and
then use those deposits – which did not belong to them – to make loans
to other people at interest. They soon became rich and powerful.
Gold coins are heavy and awkward to carry around so the custom
arose whereby the money-lenders would issue credit notes to depositors
who began to trade these notes between themselves in commercial
transactions. Paper money had come into existence.
A new form of usury developed as the swindling money-lenders
realized the immoral benefits that could be obtained from such a
situation. It became apparent to these thieves that they could go one
step further than dishonestly using other people’s money for financial
advantage at no cost to themselves. They could invent money from
absolutely nothing. They could issue credit notes with nothing to back
them up and put them into circulation as interest-bearing debts. No-one
would be any the wiser. They calculated that they could safely issue
notes for up to ten times more than the gold deposits they held, because
the depositors would never ask for their deposits back all at the same
time.
The principle of modern banking was thus established: invent
money from nothing, put it into circulation as "running cash notes" that
have to be paid back with real wealth that is produced from our labour,
sit back and become unbelievably wealthy and powerful men: hidden
rulers of nations.
In England this deceitful system was officially sanctioned in
1694. The usurper of the throne, William of Orange, had overthrown the
legitimate King James II with the financial backing and plotting of
powerful Jewish financiers in Amsterdam. In return he gave the
sovereignty of England to a group of financiers by means of a Charter
allowing them to call themselves the Bank of England. The Charter made
no mention of issuing the nation’s money, but within minutes of signing
the new Bank officials were discussing the form of their "running cash
notes." The same system was adopted in every country by a process of
Masonic revolution and manipulation.
FREEMASONRY AND COMMUNISM
Socialist theorists and ideologues have never attacked the essential
mechanism of capitalism. Although the injustices of the capitalist
system have been attacked in volume after volume, and rightly so, they
have never even hinted at the usury upon which the whole system is built
and from which all the other injustices stem.
Perhaps this is because so many Communist leaders are Jewish.
Most of the ‘Russian Revolutionists’ of 1917 were actually Jews from the
lower east side of New York City. Two hundred and seventy-five of them
were conveyed to Russia aboard the S.S. Christiana, led by
Trotsky and financed by Kuhns, Loebs, Schiffs and Warburgs. This cosy
circle of Jews and Freemasons financed both sides of the Great War.
Marx and Engels, two more Jews, wrote the Communist Manifesto on
behalf of a secret society calling themselves ‘The League of Just Men.’
This secret society was an arm of the Illuminati, whose power and
influence was the catalyst of the French Revolution. One of the founding
members of the Illuminati was the House of Rothschild, the Jewish
banking house which practically invented supra-nationalism for personal
profit.
THE SITUATION TODAY
Nowadays banking has become extremely sophisticated but the hidden
and usurious mechanism behind it remains the same. After a big enquiry,
hushed up as much as possible, the Bank of England was nationalised in
1946. In theory control of the Bank of England should then have passed
from a group of private individuals to the British Government, but this
is still not the case. Nationalisation only added a thin veneer of
respectability.
The British Treasury, in conjunction with the Bank of England’s
advisers to the Government, determine how much paper money and coin will
be issued each year. This has to accord with the wealth of the nation
for that year. But because banknotes and coins only account for a tiny
percentage of financial transactions, it makes no difference to the
bankers at all. Most financial transactions are carried out with
abstract figures on a computer screen that have no relationship to real
wealth. Everything has to be paid for at interest though – even when it
doesn’t exist!
The Government still has to pay interest on old and new loans
from the Bank. Only a few years ago it was announced that the interest
debt on a loan taken during the Napoleonic War had just been paid off!
This is where much of our tax money goes.
THE NEXT STAGE
The next stage of development for international finance is to get rid
of cash altogether. Then the token accountability of the bankers will
disappear along with the cash. Their intention is that everyone will
have to use credit/debit cards for every type of commercial transaction.
Electronic technology, when used this way, and when it is not
merely widespread but compulsory, will give them complete control of
every man, woman and child in the world. If you cannot buy or sell –
food, petrol, clothes – without a card you are completely at their
mercy. If you lose the card or it doesn’t work for some reason you will
suffer until issued with a replacement. If you make a protest against
some particular injustice they could invalidate your card. The next time
you go to the supermarket your card may not work. You won’t officially
exist!
Who benefits from such a scheme? The politicians or the bankers?
To ask the question is to answer it. The Bank of England is the real,
but hidden, government of the country. The Government and the
politicians are merely puppets controlled by the Bank – or, more
accurately, the international banking families. None of our cowardly
politicians dare stand up to these hidden and unelected rulers of the
world, so powerful have they become.
Two American presidents, possibly
three, were assassinated for attempting to do so. It is far easier for
them to submit to the system and enjoy a rich life than expose the real
tyrants: tyrants who cause high taxes, unemployment, war, famine and
misery for the rest of us. But these despots of the New World Order
forget that Truth is more powerful than they could ever become. And
Truth brings Justice!
The pen is mightier than the pound! This article first appeared in issue
5 of ‘The Anvil,’ published by The Third Position, BCM ITP, London,
WC1N 3XX.
It will be soon be 10 years (17th July) since the suspicious death of Dr David Kelly.
Kelly had been a weapons inspector in Iraq. He had tipped off contacts within the British media that the Downing Street dossier concerning alleged Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction" had been exagerated, meaning that the excuse for the 2003 invasion of Iraq was a lie.
Kelly was found slumped against a tree, the cause of death being ruled as a suicide. However, there has never been an inquest into Kelly's death.
Scientists have been calling for some time for an inquest to answer the many doubts in the suicide verdict.
